
Maxima 5.47.0 https://maxima.sourceforge.io
using Lisp GNU Common Lisp (GCL) GCL 2.7.1 git tag Version_2_7_2ore2
Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information.
(%i1) run_testsuite()
Testsuite run for GNU Common Lisp (GCL) GCL 2.7.1 git tag Version_2_7_2ore2:
Running tests in rtest_sqdnst: 13/13 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_extensions: 18/18 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_rules: 210/210 tests passed
Running tests in rtestnset: 619/619 tests passed
Running tests in rtest1: 203/203 tests passed (not counting 3 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest1a: 34/34 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest2: SIMPLE-WARNING: structure MRING is changing
299/299 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest4: 94/94 tests passed
Running tests in rtest5: SIMPLE-WARNING: structure GRAPH is changing
SIMPLE-WARNING: structure DIGRAPH is changing
;; When compiling (DEFUN FLOYD_WARSHALL-IMPL)
;;   inlining (#<@0A9E94F0> #<TAG TTL524 5C17808> ...)
;;   inlining (SYSTEM::RL #<TAG TTL524 5C16858> ...)
;;   inlining (SYSTEM::LREDUCE #<TAG TTL524 5C15EB8> ...)
;;   inlining (ARRAY-ROW-MAJOR-INDEX #<TAG TTL524 5C073E8> ...)
;;   inlining (SYSTEM:ASET #<TAG TTL524 5C06988> ...)
INTERNAL-SIMPLE-WARNING: Type mismatches binding declared SYSTEM:SEQIND variable SYSTEM::X to type (INTEGER
                                                                                                    2147483647
                                                                                                    2147483647).
;; When compiling (DEFUN FLOYD_WARSHALL-IMPL)
;;   inlining (#<@0AC60470> #<TAG TTL524 5C45478> ...)
;;   inlining (SYSTEM::RL #<TAG TTL524 5C440C8> ...)
;;   inlining (SYSTEM::LREDUCE #<TAG TTL524 5C435C8> ...)
;;   inlining (ARRAY-ROW-MAJOR-INDEX #<TAG TTL524 5C368B8> ...)
;;   inlining (SYSTEM:ASET #<TAG TTL524 5C35DD8> ...)
INTERNAL-SIMPLE-WARNING: Type mismatches binding declared SYSTEM:SEQIND variable SYSTEM::Y to type (INTEGER
                                                                                                    2147483647
                                                                                                    2147483647).
;; When compiling (DEFUN FLOYD_WARSHALL-IMPL)
;;   inlining (#<@0AD62488> #<TAG TTL524 5C56208> ...)
;;   inlining (SYSTEM::RL #<TAG TTL524 5C54D08> ...)
;;   inlining (SYSTEM::LREDUCE #<TAG TTL524 5C54268> ...)
;;   inlining (ARRAY-ROW-MAJOR-INDEX #<TAG TTL524 5C471F8> ...)
;;   inlining (SYSTEM:ASET #<TAG TTL524 5C46548> ...)
INTERNAL-SIMPLE-WARNING: Type mismatches binding declared SYSTEM:SEQIND variable SYSTEM::Y to type (INTEGER
                                                                                                    2147483647
                                                                                                    2147483647).
INTERNAL-SIMPLE-WARNING: Type mismatches binding declared SYSTEM:SEQIND variable SYSTEM::X to type (INTEGER
                                                                                                    2147483647
                                                                                                    2147483647).
83/83 tests passed
Running tests in rtest6: 53/53 tests passed
Running tests in rtest6a: 76/76 tests passed
Running tests in rtest6b: 38/38 tests passed
Running tests in rtest7: 88/88 tests passed
Running tests in rtest9: 89/89 tests passed
Running tests in rtest9a: 142/142 tests passed
Running tests in rtest10: 72/72 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest11: 258/258 tests passed
Running tests in rtest13: 23/23 tests passed
Running tests in rtest13s: 17/17 tests passed
Running tests in rtest14: 
********************** Problem 155 (line 1115) ***************
Input:
closeto(airy_dbi(1.5) - airy_dbi(1.5b0), 3.2752b-15)


Result:
true

... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
 Maxima or GNU Common Lisp (GCL).

********************** Problem 159 (line 1127) ***************
Input:
closeto(airy_dbi(1.5 + %i) - airy_dbi(1.5b0 + %i), 3.3631b-16)


Result:
true

... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
 Maxima or GNU Common Lisp (GCL).
428/428 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)

The following 2 problems passed but were expected to fail: (155 159)
Running tests in rtest15: 390/390 tests passed
Running tests in rtest16: 
rat: replaced -406810.0 by -406810/1 = -406810.0

rat: replaced -492380.0 by -492380/1 = -492380.0

rat: replaced 0.07050000000000001 by 141/2000 = 0.0705
                                    t 492380           t 85570
Refusing to factor polynomial 47 (%e )       - 4702 (%e )      + 4655
                            because its degree exceeds factor_max_degree (1000)
740/740 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtestode: 96/96 tests passed
Running tests in rtestode_zp: 30/30 tests passed
Running tests in rtest3: 241/241 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest8: 
********************** Problem 92 (line 363) ***************
Input:
ev(e1, bu = 4)


Result:
[63.75, 7.077671781985375E-13, 31, 0]

... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
 Maxima or GNU Common Lisp (GCL).

********************** Problem 95 (line 372) ***************
Input:
                 4
ev(e2, foo(u) = u )


Result:
[0.4, 4.440892098500628E-15, 21, 0]

... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
 Maxima or GNU Common Lisp (GCL).

********************** Problem 98 (line 381) ***************
Input:
ev(e3, au = - 1)


Result:
[- 0.5, 5.551115123125784E-15, 15, 0]

... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
 Maxima or GNU Common Lisp (GCL).

********************** Problem 104 (line 399) ***************
Input:
ev(e5, au = 0, omega = 2)


Result:
[0.4000000000000001, 2.2165709488159254E-11, 175, 0]

... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
 Maxima or GNU Common Lisp (GCL).

********************** Problem 107 (line 408) ***************
Input:
ev(e6, foo(u) = 1, omega = 1)


Result:
[1.0000000000000003, 1.1102230246251572E-14, 15, 0]

... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
 Maxima or GNU Common Lisp (GCL).

********************** Problem 186 (line 866) ***************
Input:
                        1
errcatch(quad_qag(r, r, -, 1, 3, 'epsrel = 5.0E-8))
                        2


Result:
[[0.37500000000000008, 4.1633363423443389E-15, 31, 0]]

... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
 Maxima or GNU Common Lisp (GCL).
189/189 tests passed (not counting 6 expected errors)

The following 6 problems passed but were expected to fail: (92 95 98
                                                            104 107
                                                            186)
Running tests in rtest12: 118/118 tests passed
Running tests in rexamples: 137/137 tests passed
Running tests in rtesthyp: 417/417 tests passed (not counting 6 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_hypgeo: 296/296 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtestmt19937: 15/15 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_allnummod: 562/562 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_maxmin: 
                                    t 492380           t 85570
Refusing to factor polynomial 47 (%e )       - 4702 (%e )      + 4655
                            because its degree exceeds factor_max_degree (1000)
106/106 tests passed (not counting 8 expected errors)
Running tests in rtestconjugate: 256/256 tests passed
Running tests in rtestsum: 337/337 tests passed (not counting 4 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_trig: 165/165 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_zeta: 32/32 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_diff_invtrig: 22/22 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_scalarp: 20/20 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_everysome: 84/84 tests passed
Running tests in rtestint: 344/344 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_numth: 218/218 tests passed
Running tests in rtestifactor: 34/34 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_equal: 206/206 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_abs: 140/140 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_taylor: 167/167 tests passed (not counting 6 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_dot: 72/72 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_mset: 113/113 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_boolean: 116/116 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_round: 101/101 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_map: 139/139 tests passed (not counting 3 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_sign: 395/395 tests passed (not counting 7 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_algebraic: 45/45 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_gamma: 827/827 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_expintegral: 212/212 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_signum: 70/70 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_lambert_w: 57/57 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_elliptic: 224/224 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_integrate: 817/817 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_integrate_special: 53/53 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_sqrt: 315/315 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_carg: 53/53 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_log: 134/134 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_power: 69/69 tests passed (not counting 3 expected errors)
Running tests in rtestdefstruct: 32/32 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_limit: 249/249 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_powerseries: 71/71 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_laplace: 95/95 tests passed (not counting 10 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_plotoptions: 5/5 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_algsys: 74/74 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_trace: 90/90 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_polynomialp: 17/17 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_limit_extra: 220/220 tests passed (not counting 59 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_gcd: 28/28 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_hg: 186/186 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_nfloat: 51/51 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_ilt: 31/31 tests passed
Running tests in ulp_tests: 
********************** Problem 8 (line 26) ***************
Input:
                                             53
unit_in_last_place(unit_in_last_place(0.0) (2   + 1)) - least_positive_float


Result:
0.0

... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
 Maxima or GNU Common Lisp (GCL).
55/55 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)

The following 1 problem passed but was expected to fail: (8)


No unexpected errors found out of 13,372 tests.
Tests that were expected to fail but passed:
  /home/camm/maxima-5.47.0/tests/rtest14.mac problems:
    (155 159)
  /home/camm/maxima-5.47.0/tests/rtest8.mac problems:
    (92 95 98 104 107 186)
  /home/camm/maxima-5.47.0/tests/ulp_tests.mac problem:
    (8)
real time       :    178.070 secs
run-gbc time    :    120.060 secs
child run time  :     42.440 secs
gbc time        :     11.480 secs
allocation      :      23263 Mbytes
(%o0)                                done
